In Kyllo v. United States (2001) the U.S. Supreme Court heldthat using a technol

In Kyllo v. United States (2001) the U.S. Supreme Court heldthat using a technological device to explore the details of a homethat would previously have been unknowable without physicalintrusion is a search and is presumptively unreasonable without awarrant. The federal prosecutor argued that thermal imaging doesnot constitute a search because (1) it detects only heat radiatingfrom the external surface of the house and therefore there was noentry and (2) it did not detect private activities occurring inprivate areas because everything that was detected was on theoutside. Do you agree with the Court or the Prosecutor? Shouldwhat radiates from a private home be protected?