Judges are called upon to decide on various issues thatrequire objectivity throughout a trial. Judges who make what seemlike biased or incorrect decisions can exacerbate an alreadyvolatile situation. In the Michael Jackson case the judge ruledthat other alleged victims could testify or be mentioned in histrial. How ethical was this decision and why? What should thecourts decision have been on this issue of prior conduct? Supportyour position applying a Deontological ethical system