Question 1: What is the mehod of reductio ad absurdum and why does it work?Question 2:Construct a proof for the following argument. You may use either direct proof conditional proof or reductio ad absurdum.1. O I2. O (S v G)3. I ~G SQuestion 3:Construct a proof for the following argument. You may use either direct proof conditional proof or reductio ad absurdum.1.~A2. (~A v M) P3. ~B (M ~P) BQuestion 4 :What exactly is the position of the mechanical jurist and how does the mechanical jurist believe legal reasoning relates to logical reasoning? Why might someone be attracted to such a view?