2. Chapter three deals with definitions of masculinity that involve an essential (essence fundamental nature real meaning) element that all masculinity has in common. Most social scientists would consider masculinity to not have an essential nature but instead the meaning would vary over time and place. What do the various essential-type definitions in this chapter seem to have in common about the nature of masculinity?3.How are the questions that social constructionists ask about meanings of masculinity very different than those asked by gender role theorists or the essentialists