Distinguish the notion of active disease and non-active disease as the law defines these terms. What are two philosophical arguments of your own to support the position that really no justification exists to make this distinction except to benefit a health insurance corporations interests. Further now imagine that you are advocating for the health insurance corporation and wish to make your best case that this distinction is not only real but also critically necessary. Finally please include an example of either a physical or mental condition that would have a fine line between active and non-active disease along with a second example where there is clearly a wide and bright line between the two.